Software
AI contract review, built for real estate.
A real estate contract doesn’t give up its terms easily: the parties, the price, and every contingency with its deadline sit scattered through a dense packet a person normally reads page by page, under a closing clock. Ezra, Ratifyly’s assistant, does that reading. He pulls out the terms, checks the file for what’s missing or inconsistent, and shows his work with the source page attached, and a human approves what counts. This page explains exactly what that means, without the hype.
123 Maple Avenue
Needs you · 1 check$485,000
Resolve first: 1 review item
Read from the contract
Take another lookParties · 5
Emily & Marcus Chen
Buyers
Robert Palmer
Seller
Fairview Mortgage
Lender
Cornerstone Title & Escrow
Title
Every field is a proposal: a person confirms or corrects each one.
The terms
Reading every page is table stakes.
Plenty of software can read a contract now. Ezra reads so Ratifyly can orchestrate: every date, every contingency, every dollar, routed to the seat that has to act on it. The reading proves the layer works. The whole is the product.
- Parties and their roles: buyer, seller, and who represents each side
- Price, earnest money, and deposits, read from the contract, not re-keyed
- Every contingency and the deadline that governs it: inspection, financing, appraisal, title
- The day-counting convention the contract uses (calendar or business days), applied the way the form defines it
- What’s actually in the packet: a combined PDF is split into its real documents and each is identified
FW: Ratified contract, 48 Harborview
jordan@yourbrokerage.com → ezra@in.ratifyly.com
Filed automatically
48 Harborview Drive · 3 documents filed · deadlines updated · audit queued for review
The audit
Every finding comes with its evidence
Once the file is read, it’s cross-checked against itself and against what the deal expects to see. Each finding is surfaced with the source page one click away, for a human to approve or dismiss. Nothing clears on the AI’s word alone.
- Missing signatures and initials: the page and the party still outstanding
- Dates that don’t line up from one document to the next
- Required disclosures that never made it into the file
- Deadlines that conflict once the contract is read as a whole
- Documents the deal expects that never arrived
48 Harborview Drive
Audit ran 2 minutes ago · checks across the packet
Must resolve · 2
Signature date differs from the ratification date
Lead-paint disclosure
EMD amount doesn't match the escrow letter
Purchase agreement
Passing · 12
Signatures present · dates consistent · required documents on file
Amendments
Every deadline moves with it
When a new document lands, software reads it against the deal already on file, and when a date moves, the whole timeline re-flows so every dependent deadline lands where it should. The audit re-runs, so a late change can’t quietly break a date downstream.
Your deadlines
1 needs you now; don't let a contingency lapse.
Needs you now
Coming up
Done
Contract status
Lender status
Fairview Mortgage
Closing office status
Cornerstone Title & Escrow
The new document is reconciled with the contract it changes, not read alone
Move the closing date and every dependent deadline shifts with it
The audit re-runs on every change, so nothing silently falls out of date
Dates are the highest-stakes part of a file: the failures that cost a deposit are almost always a deadline nobody re-counted. More on why, and how to build a file that catches them: The deadlines that decide a deal.
Hard inputs
Scans and handwriting, handled honestly
- Not every contract arrives as clean text
- Some files are faxed, photocopied, or photographed on a phone, and some carry handwritten dates and initials. A true scan or a handwritten page is read with a vision-capable model that works from the image itself, not just extracted text.
- Harder inputs get more scrutiny, not a guess
- When an input is ambiguous (a smudged date, an initial that could belong to one of two people), it’s escalated for closer review instead of being turned into a confident guess. Clean PDFs are the easy case; the system is built to ask rather than assume.
Approval and trust
Nothing that counts ships on the AI’s word alone
- A human approves what counts
- Every extracted field, every finding, every computed date is a proposal. A person reviews it and approves or dismisses it before it counts. The AI does the exhaustive reading; the human makes the calls that carry consequence. The human-in-the-loop isn’t a stopgap until the models improve: in a file where a wrong reading has legal and financial weight, it’s the point.
- Handled like a brokerage protects its own files
- We take in the least data that makes the product work, wall every account off from every other, and encrypt what we store in transit and at rest. Your contract is read and audited: never sold, never shared, and never used to train AI models.How we handle your data
Still early
An honest read on what AI review does and doesn’t do
The most AI-curious audience deserves the caveats, not just the pitch. Here is where the category is young and where the human is load-bearing by design.
- Early days for the category
- Software that reads the file (instead of just storing it) is new. It works, and it works on real transactions, but it doesn’t yet have the decade-long track record the tools before it do.
- Invite-only early access
- Ratifyly is in invite-only early access, not general availability. We onboard brokerages and teams deliberately so each one gets set up right, rather than opening the doors and hoping.
- State variance is real
- Counting a deadline correctly in one state is not the same as counting it in the next: forms, contracts, and statutes differ. Coverage is built one jurisdiction at a time.See where we work
- Support, not replacement
- AI review makes a reviewer far more effective; it does not make the reviewer optional. It supports the professional judgment of an agent, broker, or attorney; it doesn’t replace it.
Everything Ezra reads and every date he computes is decision support, not legal advice. Always verify terms and deadlines against the contract and the controlling statute.
Keep exploring
Or watch the whole path a single forwarded email takes, from intake to closing, on how it works.
See what your next contract becomes
Forward a recent contract and we’ll show you the review it produces: the terms it extracts, the findings it raises, and the deadlines it tracks, with a human approving what counts.